4019/22
The development consists of proposed 3-storey over lower ground mixed use development incorporating: 3-person 2-bedroom apartment at lower ground level; medical suites with a reception area at ground floor level; a 4-person 2-bedroom apartment at first floor level; a 2-person 1-bedroom apartment at second floor level; and all ancillary works including bicycle parking, landscaping, boundary treatments, lighting, foul/surface drainage, refuse storage, and site works necessary to facilitate the development.
Core Refusal Reason
The proposed development constitutes overdevelopment of a restricted infill site, characterized by excessive height and massing that is visually incongruous with the established residential character, while failing to provide adequate parking and servicing facilities in a congested area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The scale, massing, and contemporary design of the building completely disregard the prevailing modest scale of the terrace, resulting in a visually discordant feature that would tower over neighboring gardens.
- The intensification of use, specifically the introduction of a medical suite and multiple apartments on a restricted site, would lead to unacceptable noise, disturbance, and loss of privacy for adjoining residents.
- The total absence of off-street parking and delivery/servicing arrangements for a mixed-use scheme would exacerbate existing severe congestion and create significant traffic hazards on Cameron Square.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal sought permission for a 3-storey over lower ground floor mixed-use building (307.5sqm) comprising a medical suite and three apartments at 22 Cameron Square, Kilmainham. The site is a restricted corner side garden within a traditional terrace of two-storey houses, characterized by a significant drop in levels to the north. While the applicant argued that the site's location on the edge of the St. James's Healthcare Campus (SDRA 14) justified increased density and a 'satellite healthc...PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP