Core Refusal Reason
The application for an extension of duration was refused because the development had not commenced and no substantial works had been carried out, failing to meet the mandatory statutory requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The applicant confirmed on the application form that no works have commenced on the site to date.
- The proposal fails to satisfy the requirements of Section 42(1)(a)(i)(I) of the Planning and Development Act 2000, as the development was not commenced before the expiration of the appropriate period.
- The proposal fails to meet the criteria of Section 42(1)(a)(i)(III) as no substantial works were carried out pursuant to the original permission (Ref: 16/530) during its valid period.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
Roonith Properties Ltd. sought an extension of duration for planning permission 16/530, which authorized the construction of 25 houses, a bored well, and associated infrastructure at Bottle Hill, Doon, Co. Limerick. The planning authority refused the application because the development had not yet commenced. Under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended), an extension of duration cannot be granted if the development has not started and substantial works have not been comp...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.