Core Refusal Reason
The Planning Authority initially refused permission citing a significant break in the established building line and an incongruous form of development; however, the Inspector recommended a grant of permission, concluding that the proposal is a compatible infill development that provides necessary densification without injuring visual or residential amenities.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed development is acceptable in principle under the Z1 zoning objective and complies with Section 15.13.3 regarding infill and side garden housing developments.
- The low-rise nature of the bungalow ensures it is not excessively dominant or obtrusive, and it has the potential to 'book-end' the terrace and provide a stronger urban edge to the junction.
- Adequate private open space is provided for both existing and proposed dwellings, and the separation distances are sufficient to ensure no undue overshadowing or overlooking of neighboring properties.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective Z1Section 15.5.2Section 15.13.3Section 16.10.9
Decision Document Summary
This report pertains to a first-party appeal regarding the proposed construction of a 72sqm two-bedroom L-shaped bungalow at 76A Cappagh Avenue, Finglas. The site is a corner plot in a mature residential area. Dublin City Council originally refused the application, arguing the dwelling would reduce the openness of the street and break the established building line. The Inspector disagreed, noting that the building line in the immediate vicinity has already been broken and that the low-profile de...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP