4423/22
RETENTION PERMISSION: Retention of alterations to the previously granted planning permission register reference no. WEB1209/20 . These alterations are as follows: 1. Material changes to the ground floor Northwest & Southwest facing windows at the rear garden. 2. The addition of a canopy to the ground floor Northwest rear facing elevation. 3. An additional rooflight over the ground floor kitchen area. 4. Additional external storage space along the Southwest boundary adjoining the plant room. 5. Amendments to the rear northeast facing dormer window. 6. The omission of south westerly facing rooflights at attic level. 7. The inclusion of two no additional Velux windows at the roof to allow for roof maintenance. 8. The increase in height of a section of parapet to the easterly facing elevation.
Core Planning Reasoning
The Inspector recommended the omission of Condition No. 3, concluding that the metal cladding finish on the canopy is of high quality, integrates well with the existing dwelling, and does not negatively impact the residential amenity, privacy, or daylight of neighboring properties compared to a glazed finish.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The appeal is appropriately confined to the consideration of Condition No. 3 only, using the provisions of Section 139 of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
- The proposed metal finish for the canopy is durable, high-quality, and integrates well with the main dwelling without causing injury to the visual amenities of the area.
- There is no significant material difference in terms of outlook or impact on daylight between a glazed canopy and the metal-clad version already installed at this specific location.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The application seeks retention permission for various alterations to a previously granted permission (WEB1209/20) at a large detached dwelling located at 130 Howth Road, Clontarf. The alterations include changes to windows, additional rooflights, and a canopy. Dublin City Council granted permission but included a condition (No. 3) requiring the canopy to be fitted with clear glazing. The first-party appeal specifically contested this condition, arguing for a metal finish. The Inspector found th...PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP