Core Refusal Reason
While the Planning Authority initially refused permission due to the extension's 3.63m projection and gable-fronted design, the Inspector recommended a grant of permission subject to a reduced depth of 3m and a hipped roof profile to ensure compatibility with the streetscape and neighboring amenities.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The inspector determined that a reduced projection of 3m (down from 3.63m) strikes an appropriate balance between providing a functional ground-floor bedroom for an elderly relative and protecting the character of the existing streetscape.
- The proposed gable-fronted roof was found to be out of character with the hipped roofs of the original dwellings, resulting in a condition requiring the applicant to submit revised hipped roof details.
- Technical assessments, including the 45-degree line test for daylight, confirmed that the proposed extension would not cause undue overshadowing or loss of light to adjoining properties.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective DMS42Objective PM45Objective PM46Zoning Objective RS (Residential)
Decision Document Summary
This report pertains to a first-party appeal against Fingal County Council's decision to refuse a single-storey front extension at No. 179 Broadmeadow, Swords. The applicant sought the extension (comprising a bedroom, ensuite, and porch) to facilitate live-in care for an elderly parent. The Planning Authority cited excessive projection beyond the building line and poor design integration as reasons for refusal. The site is located in an established residential area zoned 'RS'. The Inspector note...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.