Core Planning Reasoning
The Inspector recommended the omission of Condition No. 4, concluding that the original proposal for a front-facing dormer window would not negatively impact visual or residential amenities and that the restrictive modifications required by the Planning Authority were unwarranted.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed front dormer extension is considered acceptable in terms of scale and design and would not seriously injure the visual amenities of the streetscape or the character of the area.
- The significant alterations to dimensions and materials imposed by Condition No. 4 are not warranted as they would detrimentally affect the usability of the internal space without providing a necessary planning benefit.
- The proposed high-quality finishes, specifically the pre-patinated zinc in heather colour, are appropriate for the location and would integrate effectively with the existing dwelling.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028Objective Z1Appendix 18: Ancillary Residential AccommodationSection 4.0: Alterations at Roof Level/Attics/Dormers/Additional FloorsSection 5.0: Attic Conversions/Dormer Windows
Decision Document Summary
This Inspector's Report evaluates a first-party appeal against Condition No. 4 of Dublin City Council's decision to grant permission (WEB1665/22) for an attic alteration at 130 Clontarf Road, Dublin 3. The development involves a lean-to dormer window to the front roof pitch of a semi-detached dwelling. The Planning Authority's condition sought to strictly limit the dormer's dimensions and mandate specific traditional materials. The Inspector found that these restrictions were overly prescriptive...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP