Core Reason for the Refused Part
The proposed side extensions and window modifications would unbalance the classical design and materially alter the original fenestration of a Protected Structure within a significant terrace.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed side extensions would unbalance the original classical design intent of the subject dwelling and the entire terrace of Protected Structures.
- Lowering the basement window cill levels would materially alter fenestration that is considered an integral part of the original design of the Protected Structure.
- The development would detract from the character and appearance of Sorrento Terrace and fails to comply with specific heritage policies of the County Development Plan.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Policy Objective HER8: Work to Protected StructuresSection 12.11.2.1 Works to a Protected Structure
Decision Document Summary
This application sought permission for the refurbishment and extension of Sorrento House, a Protected Structure located at 1 Sorrento Terrace, Dalkey. While much of the refurbishment was acceptable, the planning authority issued a split decision, refusing the side extensions and the lowering of basement window cills. These specific elements were deemed to negatively impact the architectural integrity and classical symmetry of both the individual house and the wider terrace, thereby contravening ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.