Core Refusal Reason
The proposed development would result in a substandard form of residential amenity for future occupiers of Unit 9 due to the inadequate layout and the unsuitable location of its private open space at the front of the unit, which lacks sufficient privacy and functionality.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The principle of residential intensification and the subdivision of the existing property is broadly consistent with national planning policy for urban infill sites.
- The proposed design for Unit 9 is functionally flawed because the primary private open space is located in the front garden, which is directly adjacent to a public footpath and road, leading to a lack of privacy and poor amenity.
- The internal layout of Unit 9 is compromised by the requirement to provide access to the front-facing open space, which creates a 'through-route' in the main living area and further diminishes the quality of the accommodation.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective RSObjective PM44Objective DMS44Objective DMS90Objective SPQH035Objective SPQHO37Objective SPQHO38Objective SPQHO42Objective CIOSO53Table 14.4Objective DMS024Table 14.7Section 14.7.3Section 14.7.6Section 14.10.1Objective DMSO32
Decision Document Summary
The application seeks planning permission for the change of use of a single-storey semi-detached house (No. 9) and an unattached outbuilding (No. 9A) at Drynam Road, Swords, into two one-bedroom apartments. The proposal includes a linking extension to create a shared entrance lobby. The site is zoned 'RS' (Residential) under the Fingal County Development Plan. While the applicant argued that the site has a history of dual-occupancy and that the proposal supports national policy for compact urban...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.