Core Refusal Reason
The proposal was refused due to its visually obtrusive and incongruous design, failure to justify the need for ancillary family accommodation, and inadequate surface water management.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The design of the side extension at second floor and attic level is considered incongruous and obtrusive, resulting in a significant negative impact on the visual and residential amenities of the area.
- The applicant failed to adequately demonstrate a valid need for the proposed unit as ancillary family accommodation, thereby failing to meet the requirements of Section 16.10.14 of the Development Plan.
- The application did not provide satisfactory proposals for the management of surface water, which is contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 16.10.12Appendix 17Section 16.10.14
Decision Document Summary
The proposal involved the erection of a one and two-storey extension to the side and rear of an existing dwelling at 85A Glenhill Road, Finglas, including a new attic level. Dublin City Council refused permission because the scale and design of the extension were deemed visually obtrusive and harmful to the character of the prominent site. Furthermore, the development failed to justify the requirement for an ancillary family unit and lacked sufficient technical details regarding surface water dr...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.