Core Refusal Reason
The proposed 36m telecommunications mast was refused due to its significant adverse visual impact on a highly sensitive landscape and protected views (including the Hill of Tara), failure to justify the need for a new structure over co-location, and the lack of a required Archaeological Impact Assessment.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed development would be visually obtrusive and detrimental to the 'Tara Skyrne Hills' Landscape Character Area and several protected views, including the Hill of Tara, contravening policies intended to protect landscapes of exceptional value.
- The applicant failed to provide adequate documentary evidence to demonstrate that co-location on existing support structures was not a feasible option, as required by the County Development Plan.
- In the absence of a site-specific Archaeological Impact Assessment, the Planning Authority could not determine if the proposal would negatively affect the archaeological heritage of this highly sensitive historical area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
HER OBJ 56HER POL 52HER OBJ 49INF POL 59HER POL 2HER POL 3Section 8.18DM POL 29INF POL 60HER OBJ 50
Decision Document Summary
Emerald Tower Ltd proposed the erection of a 36-metre high lattice telecommunications support structure at Blundelstown, Navan, Co. Meath. The site is situated within the 'Tara Skyrne Hills and Upland Area', a landscape designated as being of exceptional value and high sensitivity. Meath County Council refused permission primarily because the scale and location of the mast would negatively impact protected views and the character of the sensitive landscape. Additionally, the refusal was based on...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.