WEB1832/22

The provision of a 79sqm 2-bed, 2.5-storey mews dwelling with flat roof to front and pitched zinc roof to rear. New timber fences to sides of rear garden boundaries and off-street parking for 1 car facing Windsor Lane

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

The development was refused due to significant flood risks associated with a basement living area in Flood Zone B, and because the proposal constitutes a substandard design that fails to meet minimum national standards for floor area, bedroom width, and residential amenity.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The provision of a basement living area within Flood Zone B is directly contrary to Policy SI20 of the Dublin City Development Plan, which presumes against such development to manage flood risk.
  • The dwelling is considered substandard as it falls below the minimum 80sqm floor area required for a 2-bed/4-person unit and features bedrooms that do not meet the minimum required width of 2.8m.
  • The proposed design provides poor passive surveillance of Windsor Lane and results in a cramped residential environment with inadequate sanitary and storage facilities for future occupants.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Policy SI20Section 15.18.4Section 15.13.5Section 15.13.5.1Section 15.13.5.2Section 15.13.5.3Section 15.13.5.4

Decision Document Summary

The application proposed a 2.5-storey, 2-bedroom mews dwelling (approx. 79sqm, later reduced to 74sqm) on a site to the rear of No. 13 Windsor Avenue, Dublin 3, fronting onto Windsor Lane. While the Planning Authority initially granted permission, the Inspector recommended refusal following a third-party appeal. The site context involves a narrow mews laneway in Fairview with varying property ownership. The Inspector's primary arguments centered on flood risk and design quality: a Site-Specific ...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP