4930/22
The development will consist of demolition of existing rear single storey synagogue (89.8m2) and external WC accommodation (13.6m2) and construction of a new single storey synagogue (149.8m2) with a sedum roof, 4 roof lights and a glass canopy, internal alterations within the existing 2 storey office building to the front, provision of a new single storey porch (4.6m2), relocated pedestrian entrance from Rathmore Villas and all associated site works.
Core Planning Reasoning
The proposed development is considered acceptable as it is consistent with the Z1 zoning objective, represents the continuation of an established use, and, subject to a condition reducing the northern boundary wall height, will not seriously injure the residential or visual amenities of the area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The principle of development is established and consistent with the 'Z1 - Sustainable Residential Neighbourhoods' zoning objective where places of public worship are permissible.
- Potential negative impacts on the residential amenity of No. 75 Terenure Road North, specifically regarding overbearing and overshadowing, can be effectively mitigated by reducing the height of the northern boundary wall to match the existing levels.
- The proposed car parking and bicycle parking provisions are appropriate given the site's intermediate urban location, proximity to public transport, and the religious ethos of the congregation which restricts driving on the Sabbath.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This report assesses a third-party appeal against the grant of permission for the demolition of an existing rear synagogue and the construction of a new, larger (149.8sqm) single-storey synagogue at 77 Terenure Road North. The site is a corner plot currently housing office uses in the main building and religious uses to the rear. The Inspector addressed key concerns from the appellant (No. 75) regarding overdevelopment and overshadowing. While the proposal increases the synagogue's footprint by ...PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP