Core Refusal Reason
While the Planning Authority initially refused permission citing over-development and visual dominance, the Inspector recommends a grant, concluding that the proposal is a well-integrated extension that respects the character of the area and residential amenities.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed design and layout are considered a well-executed extension of an existing dwelling that makes appropriate use of a larger side garden while maintaining visual harmony with the streetscape.
- The extension will not have a significant adverse impact on the residential amenities of adjoining properties regarding overshadowing or overlooking, as it adheres to established building lines and development patterns in Harbour View.
- The development complies with the provisions for residential extensions set out in the Fingal Development Plan 2023-2029 and represents proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective PM46Section 14.10.2 (Residential Extensions)Section 14.10.2.2 (Side Extensions)Section 14.10.2.3 (Ground Floor Extensions (rear))Section 14.10.2.4 (First Floor Extensions)RS - Residential ZoningTC - Town and District Centre Zoning
Decision Document Summary
This report concerns a first-party appeal against Fingal County Council's decision to refuse permission for a 55sqm two-storey extension to a 71.65sqm end-of-terrace dwelling at 41 Harbour View, Howth. The site is uniquely positioned with a larger side garden and sits on a split-zoned plot (RS and TC). While the Planning Authority argued the proposal constituted over-development and was unduly dominant, the Inspector found that the extension's mono-pitch design successfully aligns with the neigh...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.