5112/22

The development will consist of (a) the demolition of the existing dwelling and the existing shed, (b) the construction of a detached, 3-bedroom single storey dwelling (131.60sq.m.) together with 10 no. associated roof lights, (c) all associated boundary treatments , landscaping and site works with provision for 1 no. parking space

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

The proposed development is considered a suitable replacement for a dwelling in disrepair, is compatible with the 'Z1' residential zoning objective, and provides an acceptable standard of amenity without negatively impacting neighbouring properties or public safety.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed development, as modified at Further Information stage, is acceptable and does not give rise to significant drainage, residential amenity, or accessibility concerns.
  • The proposal will positively contribute to the character of the area by allowing for the redevelopment of a dwelling in a state of disrepair on a backland site.
  • The development is in accordance with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area, specifically complying with the Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028 and national compact settlement guidelines.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Zoning Objective Z1 (Sustainable Residential Neighbourhoods)Zoning Objective Z2 (Residential Neighbourhoods – Conservation Areas)Section 13.8 (Strategic Regeneration Development Area 6 - Docklands)Policy SC12 – Housing MixPolicy QHSN6 – Urban ConsolidationPolicy SI15 - Site-Specific Flood Risk AssessmentPolicy GI41 - Protect Existing TreesSection 15.7.1 (Re-use of existing building materials)Section 15.8.6 (Public Open Space)Section 15.13.4 (Backland housing)Appendix 3 (Sustainable Compact Growth Policy for Density and Building Height)

Decision Document Summary

The applicant seeks to demolish an existing uninhabitable single-storey bungalow and shed at Bayview Cottage, Ringsend, and construct a new 3-bedroom detached single-storey dwelling (131.60 sq.m). The site is a backland plot accessed via a narrow 60m laneway. Third-party appellants raised significant concerns regarding the narrowness of the access lane for emergency services, potential structural damage to adjacent historical properties, and the contested ownership of the laneway. During the app...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP