Core Refusal Reason
The proposal represents uncoordinated, piecemeal backland development that fails to respect the character of the Architectural Conservation Area and would result in a substandard level of residential amenity.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed development constitutes a substandard and piecemeal form of backland development that fails to integrate with the existing urban fabric or respect the character and context of the surrounding area.
- The layout and design provide inadequate residential amenity for future occupants and would negatively impact the privacy and value of adjoining properties, while failing to comply with 'Outer Town Core' zoning objectives.
- The proposal fails to demonstrate an appreciation for the built heritage of the Roscommon Town Architectural Conservation Area (ACA) and would set an undesirable precedent for uncoordinated development in the town center.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Chapter 3 - Economic DevelopmentChapter 5 - HousingChapter 9 - Development Management Guidelines and StandardsSection 9.6 of the CDPCore Policy 2.4Core Policy 2.6Section 7.11 - Built and Natural HeritageSection 7.13 - Urban Development and DesignSection 8.3.10 - New Residential DevelopmentPolicy 73Policy 74Chapter 6 (Land use zoning figures and matrix)
Decision Document Summary
John Igoe sought permission for two semi-detached single-storey dwellings on a backland site in Ballypheasan Townland, Roscommon, situated between Abbey Street and Henry Street. The site is located within the Roscommon Town Architectural Conservation Area and is subject to dual zoning ('Outer Town Core' and 'Existing Residential'). The application was refused because it was deemed a piecemeal and uncoordinated development that would result in substandard residential amenity, fail to respect the ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.