211127

The development was refused due to its adverse visual impact on a scenic landscape resulting from elevated topography and extensive boundary removal, combined with failures to demonstrate adequate traffic safety sightlines and suitable ground conditions for wastewater treatment.

• The proposed dwelling, by reason of its elevated topography and the extensive works required to the roadside boundary, would result in a visually prominent and intrusive feature that detracts from the rural character and scenic quality of Development Zone 2.
• The applicant failed to demonstrate that the minimum sightline visibility of 75m in each direction could be achieved at the proposed entrance, meaning the development would endanger public safety by reason of a traffic hazard.
• It was not demonstrated that the ground conditions are adequately suitable to accommodate the required secondary wastewater treatment system and polishing filter in compliance with the EPA Code of Practice 2021, which would be prejudicial to public health.