211882

change of use of existing fire damaged ground floor public house (Flower Hill Lodge) to a one bedroom apartment, refurbishment of existing first floor accommodation over public house to a one bedroom apartment, demolition and removal of existing fire damaged structures to rear and construction of a new three storey apartment block containing 4 no. two bedroom apartments and 4 no. one bedroom apartments, proposed rear communal open space, bicycle and refuse storage, repair works to existing public house roof structure, minor alterations to front elevation and all associated site and civil works. Total number of apartments is 10

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The development was refused due to excessive density, scale, and bulk that would negatively impact residential amenity, combined with a lack of parking and inadequate provision for refuse collection access.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed density of 95 units per hectare and the building's excessive height, scale, and bulk are unsympathetic to the existing character and would result in a substandard form of development that negatively impacts residential amenity.
  • The proposal fails to provide adequate car and bicycle parking, and the design of private amenity spaces (enclosed balconies with obscure glass) is considered poor and injurious to the outlook of future residents.
  • The lack of information regarding site access for refuse collection poses a potential traffic hazard and obstruction on a highly trafficked roadway, rendering the development contrary to proper planning and sustainable development.

Cited Policies (CDP)

CS OBJ 1CS OBJ 4SH OBJ 9DM POL 12DM POL 13DM POL 14DM OBJ 39DM OBJ 40DM OBJ 42INF POL 18INF POL 20HER POL 21HER POL 22HER OBJ 23

Decision Document Summary

KJA Developments Ltd sought permission for the conversion and extension of the fire-damaged 'Flower Hill Lodge' public house at 68 Flowerhill, Navan, into a residential scheme comprising 10 apartments. The proposal involved a new three-storey apartment block to the rear of the existing structure. Meath County Council refused the application primarily because the proposed density (95 units/ha) significantly exceeded the recommended range for the area, and the scale of the rear extension was deeme...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.