Core Refusal Reason
Failure to demonstrate that substantial works were carried out during the original permission period as required by legislation.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence that substantial works were completed under the original grant of permission.
- The application does not meet the statutory requirements set out in Section 42(1)(a)(i)(III) of the Planning and Development Act, 2000 (as amended).
- An extension of duration cannot be granted where the criteria for commencement and progression of works have not been satisfied.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought an extension of duration for a previously granted permission to provide off-street car parking at 115 Highfield Park, Dundrum. The Planning Authority refused the request because the applicant did not demonstrate that substantial works had been carried out during the initial life of the permission. Consequently, the proposal failed to meet the mandatory legal criteria for an extension under the Planning and Development Act....SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.