Core Refusal Reason
The development negatively impacts residential amenity through overshadowing and loss of privacy, while failing to harmonize with the established visual character of the streetscape.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The first-floor rear extension's height and proximity would cause significant loss of daylight, sunlight, and privacy for adjoining occupiers.
- The two-storey front projection is visually obtrusive and fails to respect the coherent and uniform design of the existing residential streetscape.
- Granting permission would establish an undesirable precedent for similar developments that undermine the 'RS' zoning objective to protect and improve residential amenity.
Cited Policies (CDP)
RS zoning objectiveFingal County Development Plan 2013-2017 criteria for extensionsObjective DMS44
Decision Document Summary
The application sought the retention and completion of extensions at 17 Chapel Close, Balbriggan, including a rear extension and a two-storey front projection. The local authority refused the proposal on the grounds that the rear extension's scale and design would result in an overbearing impact and loss of amenity for neighboring properties. Furthermore, the front projection was found to be inconsistent with the modest, uniform character of the streetscape, violating Objective DMS44 of the Fing...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.