Core Refusal Reason
The application was refused due to non-compliance with regional road access policies, negative impact on a vernacular structure, inadequate wastewater treatment details, and potential adverse effects on protected European sites.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed development would intensify the use of an existing access onto a Protected Regional Route (R173) without meeting exemption criteria or demonstrating adequate visibility splays, thereby creating a traffic hazard.
- The scale and positioning of the extension would detract from the character of the existing vernacular building, which the Planning Authority does not consider to be a legitimate dwelling, contrary to policies protecting built heritage.
- The applicant failed to demonstrate that the proposed wastewater treatment system would comply with EPA standards or that the development would not adversely affect the conservation objectives of the Carlingford Shore SAC and Carlingford Lough SPA.
Cited Policies (CDP)
MOV 56Table 13.13BHC 44IU 18NGB 3HOU 34HOU 38HOU 47HOU 48HOU 49BHC 42BHC 5-7BH 21-22BH 38-41NGB 50NGB 36NGB 37HOU 40MOV 57ENV 39IU 16IU 17IU 19IU 26IU 27NGB 40NGB 14NGB 15
Decision Document Summary
Owen Woods sought permission for the alteration and extension of an existing stone structure at North Commons, Carlingford, Co. Louth, located within a sensitive landscape designated as Rural Policy Zone 1. The Planning Authority refused the application on four primary grounds: the intensification of an unsafe access onto the R173 Protected Regional Route, the unsympathetic design relative to the structure's vernacular character, the failure to prove the building's status as a prior dwelling, an...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.