22287

retention permission for (1) Existing dormer style log cabin operating as tourism accommodation ancillary to the adjoining campsite (2) Waste water treatment unit and percolation area (3) All ancillary site works. Permission for (1) upgrade of existing waste water treatment unit and percolation area (2) To close up an existing entrance and remove hardcore surfaced driveway (3) To construct an outdoor recreational and arts room with covered patio area ancillary to the dormer style log cabin (4) To construct a rental bike storage shed adjacent to existing on site meeting room (5) To construct a covered out door wellness, sauna and hot tub area (6) To construct a barbeque hut type building (7) and all ancillary site works

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The development is considered an incongruous and visually obtrusive feature that negatively impacts a highly sensitive landscape of exceptional value and archaeological significance.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The elevated siting and discordant design of the log cabin result in a prominent and incongruous feature that cannot be satisfactorily assimilated into the sensitive historic landscape.
  • The proposal contravenes policies intended to protect the archaeological heritage, rural character, and visual amenities of the Loughcrew and Slieve na Calliagh Hills Landscape Conservation Area.
  • In accordance with Section 35 of the Planning & Development Act, the authority considers there is a substantial risk the development would not be completed or retained as per the permission sought.

Cited Policies (CDP)

HER POL 52HER OBJ 56HER OBJ 49HER POL 54Appendix 5Appendix 10Section 9.11

Decision Document Summary

This application sought retention and planning permission for a tourism-related development, including a log cabin, wellness area, and ancillary structures at Drumsawry, Oldcastle, Co. Meath. The site is situated within the Loughcrew and Slieve na Calliagh Hills, an area of exceptional landscape value and high sensitivity. Meath County Council refused the proposal on the grounds that the structures are visually obtrusive and discordant with the rural and archaeological character of the protected...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.