Core Refusal Reason
Failure to meet statutory requirements for an extension of duration regarding commencement and substantial works.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The Planning Authority determined that the development permitted under reference D17B/0488 had not actually commenced.
- The applicant failed to demonstrate that substantial works had been carried out pursuant to the original permission.
- The application does not satisfy the mandatory legal criteria set out in Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act, as amended.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought an extension of duration for a previously approved partly single, partly two-storey extension at 42 Balally Grove, Dundrum, Dublin 16. The local authority refused the request on the grounds that the development had not commenced and no substantial works had been performed during the appropriate period of the original permission. As a result, the proposal failed to meet the statutory requirements of Section 42(1) of the Planning and Development Act, leading to a refusal of...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.