211181

the construction of a new 2 storey, 5-bedroom detached dwelling house to include new entrance gate and piers, driveway, footpaths, terrace area, landscaping, proposed new waste water treatment system and percolation area, proposed bored well and all associated site works, which is in the curtilage of the protected structure - NIAH Reg. No. 22901804, Protected Structure RPS no: 36 as recorded in the Waterford city development plan 2013-2019

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposed development would adversely impact the character and setting of a Protected Structure (Blenheim Lodge) and result in the loss of mature vegetation and trees of special amenity value within a visually vulnerable landscape.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The development would seriously and negatively impact the character, setting, and curtilage of Blenheim Lodge (a Protected Structure) and its associated walled garden, establishing an undesirable precedent for similar development.
  • The elevated nature of the site within a 'Visually Vulnerable' landscape overlooking the River Suir would result in a development that injures the visual amenities and rural character of the area.
  • The proposal, specifically the extensive driveway required, would necessitate the removal of mature vegetation and trees designated as having Special Amenity Value, contrary to policies intended to protect and preserve such features.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Policy 10.2.3Policy 10.5.4Section 4.10Schedule 4 of the Waterford City Development Plan

Decision Document Summary

Shane O'Sullivan sought planning permission for a 325sqm two-storey, five-bedroom detached dwelling and a 210m driveway at Blenheim, Waterford. The site is located within the curtilage of Blenheim Lodge, a Protected Structure, and is situated in a 'Visually Vulnerable' landscape containing trees of special amenity value. The application was refused as the Planning Authority determined the proposal would detract from the architectural heritage and setting of the Protected Structure and would lead...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.