Core Planning Reasoning
The Inspector recommended granting permission (upholding the Planning Authority's decision) because the proposed 2.5m high acoustic enclosure effectively mitigates noise disturbance to neighboring residents and is visually compatible with the existing building, ensuring no significant adverse impact on the residential amenities of the area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed acoustic enclosure is technically sufficient to reduce noise levels at sensitive receptors by 6 to 11dB, bringing residual noise within acceptable urban limits.
- The 2.5m high screen is appropriately scaled below the existing building's parapet level and will be finished to match the main structure, avoiding a deleterious visual impact on adjacent homes.
- The development complies with the Dublin City Development Plan 2022 policies regarding noise quality and the management of transitional zones between commercial and residential uses.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective Z4 (Key Urban Villages and Urban Villages)Zoning Z1 (Sustainable Residential Neighbourhood)Section 14.6 (Transitional Zone Areas)Section 15.14.11 (Leisure Centre / Gym / Fitness Studios)Section 15.5.3 (Alterations, Extensions and Retrofitting of Existing Non-Domestic Buildings)Policy SI35 (Ambient Noise Quality)
Decision Document Summary
This report pertains to a third-party appeal against the grant of retention permission for 16 rooftop condenser units and the proposed erection of a 2.5m high acoustic screen at a Flyefit gym in Whitehall Works, Drumcondra. The site is a backland location adjacent to residential properties in All Hallows Square. A previous application (PA ref. 4189/22) was refused due to inadequate noise mitigation. The current proposal includes a more robust acoustic enclosure supported by a Plant Noise Assessm...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP