Core Refusal Reason
The application was refused due to the failure to provide critical technical information regarding environmental management, traffic safety, and the protection of archaeological heritage.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The applicant failed to demonstrate compliance with Good Agricultural Practice (GAP) regulations through the submission of adequate nutrient management plans and effluent flow sketches.
- The proposed site layout did not achieve the minimum required sight distance of 65 meters in both directions from the site entrance within the red line boundary.
- The absence of an Archaeological Impact Assessment prevented a full evaluation of the development's impact on Registered Monument WX040-024 (Castle Tower House).
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective AH05
Decision Document Summary
This application sought retention permission for agricultural buildings at Bryanstown, Inch. The Planning Authority refused the proposal because the applicant provided insufficient information to assess environmental compliance regarding soiled water and nutrient management. Furthermore, the development failed to meet necessary traffic safety standards for sightlines and lacked a required archaeological assessment to safeguard a nearby registered monument, making it contrary to Objective AH05 of...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.