Core Refusal Reason
The application failed to meet the statutory requirements for an extension of duration as development had not commenced and no substantial works were carried out prior to the expiration of the original permission.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development to which the permission relates was not commenced before the expiration of the appropriate period, failing to satisfy Section 42(1)(a)(i)(I) of the Act.
- No substantial works were carried out pursuant to the permission during the appropriate period, failing to satisfy Section 42(1)(a)(i)(II) of the Act.
- The application does not meet the mandatory requirements of Section 42(1) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended) for the extension of the appropriate period.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The applicants sought an extension of duration for planning permission (Ref: 16601189) concerning the construction of a single-storey dwelling, garage, and septic tank system at Ballydavid, Littleton, Co. Tipperary. Upon evaluation and site inspection, the Planning Authority found that development had not commenced and no substantial works had been performed. As the proposal failed to meet the statutory criteria under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, the extension was refused...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.