Core Refusal Reason
The application failed to meet the statutory requirements of Section 42(1)(a) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended) as the development had not commenced and no substantial works were carried out prior to the expiration of the original permission.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development has not commenced and no substantial works were carried out on-site prior to the application for an extension of duration, failing to meet the criteria of Section 42(1)(a)(I) and (III).
- The applicant failed to provide the mandatory information required under Article 42(ff) of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001, as amended.
- Under current legislation, it is not possible to grant an extension of duration for a development that has not yet commenced and where no substantial works have been performed.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
Cappoquin Transport Ltd. applied for an extension of duration for planning permission (Ref. 17/340) concerning the construction of a new warehouse with ancillary offices and loading facilities at the IDA Industrial Estate, Dungarvan, Co. Waterford. Following a site inspection, the Planning Authority confirmed that no works had commenced on-site. The application was refused because it failed to satisfy the statutory requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, which necess...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.