22462

demolition of portion of existing dwelling to facilitate the subdivision of existing dwelling and site into two separate detached dwelling units with new open passage way between units; closing up of doorway to Unit A (east); partial demolition reconfiguration & front, rear and side extension to Unit B (west) to include new roof lights, elevation changes; new separate access with new gates to Unit B along with all associated site works

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposed development constitutes overdevelopment of a restricted site, exceeding the maximum density permitted under the R10 zoning objective and creating an unequal subdivision that is out of character with the established pattern of large detached dwellings on spacious plots.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed subdivision would result in a density of approximately 16 units per hectare, which materially contravenes the R10 Residential zoning objective that limits density to a maximum of 10 units per hectare.
  • The unequal subdivision of the existing plot would create a new site that is significantly smaller and narrower than adjoining properties, failing to respect the established character of the area which is defined by detached dwellings on large plots.
  • The development would be out of character with the existing pattern of development in the vicinity and would set an undesirable precedent for similar sub-standard infill development that would unduly impact residential amenities.

Cited Policies (CDP)

HD2 (Housing Design)H10 (Residential Infill)Appendix 1: Development and Design StandardsR10 Residential Zoning Objective

Decision Document Summary

The proposal sought permission for the subdivision of an existing single-storey detached dwelling and its 0.0625Ha site at Newlands, Kinlen Road, Greystones, into two separate detached units (Unit A and Unit B). The works included partial demolition, reconfiguration, and extensions to create a new one-bedroom infill dwelling. Although the executive planner's report initially recommended a grant, the final decision was to refuse permission. The refusal was based on the grounds that the developmen...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.