Core Refusal Reason
The application failed to meet the statutory requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 because development had not commenced on-site.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- A site inspection confirmed that the applicant has not commenced development on the site, failing to satisfy the requirements of Section 42(1)(a)(i)(I).
- The application fails to demonstrate that substantial works were carried out pursuant to the original permission (Ref: 17/600588) during the appropriate period.
- The proposal does not satisfy the alternative criteria for an extension under Section 42(1A) or 42(1B) of the Planning and Development Act 2000, as amended.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought an extension of duration for planning permission (Ref: 17/600588) concerning the construction of a replacement dwelling, garage, and septic tank at Ballyknock, Cashel, Co. Tipperary. Upon evaluation and site inspection, the Planning Authority determined that no works had been initiated on the site. The application was refused because it failed to meet the mandatory legal threshold under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, which requires that development m...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.