WEB2080/22
For development at 86 Collins Avenue East, Dublin 5 (already granted but expired in May ’22). The development will consist of: new vehicle entrance with piers and associated works. All finishes to match existing and all the above to include associated siteworks and all services connected to existing.
Refused
Core Refusal Reason
The proposed vehicular entrance would necessitate the removal or interference with an existing bus stop and Kassel kerbing. Relocation of this infrastructure is not feasible, and the conflict would prevent safe access and egress while compromising public transport accessibility and pedestrian safety.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed 3.5m wide access exceeds the maximum Development Plan standard of 3m for single residential dwellings.
- The location of the entrance directly conflicts with the designated bus stop clear zone and specialized Kassel kerbing required for mobility-impaired passengers.
- The proposed maneuvering arrangement, which relies on using the dished kerb of an adjacent property, is considered inappropriate and would interfere with the safe operation of the bus stop.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028Zoning Objective Z1Chapter 8: Policy objective SMT11Chapter 8: Policy objective SMT02Appendix 5, Section 4.0Appendix 5, Section 4.3Appendix 5, Section 4.3.1Appendix 5, Section 4.3.3
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought permission for a new vehicular entrance and associated works at 86 Collins Avenue East, a terraced property in a Z1-zoned residential area. The primary planning conflict arises from a bus stop located directly in front of the site, which features Kassel kerbing to facilitate level access for buses. Dublin City Council initially refused permission due to the impact on public transport infrastructure. On appeal, the Inspector noted that while the applicant had a previous 2017 ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP