Core Refusal Reason
The Planning Authority initially refused permission because the 5.6m entrance width exceeded the 3m maximum limit specified in Appendix 5 of the City Development Plan, which they argued would set an undesirable precedent.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The entrance has good sightlines and presents no traffic safety issues that would warrant a refusal.
- The widened entrance is consistent with the established character of Mourne Road, where many neighboring properties have entrances exceeding 3m.
- The retention of the 5.6m entrance would not set an undesirable precedent and is compatible with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028Appendix 5 (Transport and Mobility)Paragraph 4.3.1 (Vehicular Entrances Dimensions)Zoning Z1 (Residential Amenities)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal involves the retention of a widened vehicular entrance (from 3.6m to 5.6m) at a residential property in Drimnagh. While Dublin City Council refused permission based on strict adherence to Development Plan standards regarding maximum entrance widths (3m), the Inspector's assessment focused on the local context. The Inspector noted that the surrounding area already features a high frequency of similarly widened entrances. Given the lack of traffic safety concerns and the existing patt...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP