Core Refusal Reason
The development had not commenced and no substantial works were carried out prior to the application for an extension of duration, failing to meet the statutory requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended).
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development to which the permission relates was not commenced before the expiration of the appropriate period, and no substantial works were carried out pursuant to the permission during that period.
- The applicant failed to provide mandatory information required under Article 42(ff) of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001 (as amended).
- The application fails to satisfy the statutory requirements of Section 42(1)(a), (b), and (c) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended), rendering the authority unable to grant an extension.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought an extension of duration for planning file ref. 17/448, which permitted the construction of a single-storey dwelling, septic tank, and associated site works at Stradballymore, Stradbally, Co. Waterford. Waterford City and County Council refused the extension primarily because a site inspection confirmed that development had not commenced and no substantial works had been performed. Additionally, the application was found to be non-compliant with the Planning and Developme...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.