SD22B/0364

Attic conversion for storage with 2 dormer windows to the rear. Side first floor extension for 2 additional bedrooms with raised gable to side. 2 storey front extension with gable. Front bay window extension with pitched roof over. Widening of front vehicular access. Raised fencing and gate to front and side of front garden. Single storey extension to rear. 4 velux windows to the front roof area.

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

The proposed development is deemed to be in accordance with the 'RES' zoning objective of the South Dublin County Development Plan 2022-2028, providing an acceptable architectural design that does not seriously injure the visual or residential amenities of the area or neighboring properties by way of overlooking or overshadowing.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed design, including the half-hipped roof and bay window, adds architectural interest to the facade and is compatible with the existing character and pattern of development on Dodder Road Lower.
  • Third-party concerns regarding overlooking of No. 55 are physically unfounded as No. 56 is located between the appeal site and the appellant’s property, making direct overlooking of the appellant's garden impossible.
  • The extension is considered a suitable form of residential consolidation that respects the 9.5m setback from the public road and does not result in a loss of residential amenity for occupants or neighbors.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Objective RESPolicy H14: Residential ExtensionsH14 Objective 1Chapter 12: Implementation and MonitoringSection 12.6.8: Residential ConsolidationSouth Dublin County Council House Extension Design Guide 2010

Decision Document Summary

The application seeks permission for a first-floor side extension, a single-storey rear extension, an attic conversion for storage with dormers, and a front bay window at a semi-detached dwelling in Rathfarnham. South Dublin County Council initially granted permission, which was subsequently appealed by a third party (a neighbor at No. 55) citing concerns over loss of symmetry, overbearing massing, and loss of privacy. The Inspector's assessment highlights that the development is set back 9.5m f...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.