Core Refusal Reason
The application failed to meet the statutory requirements of Section 42(1)(a) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended) because the development had not commenced and no substantial works were carried out before the expiration of the original permission.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development to which the permission relates was not commenced before the expiration of the appropriate period sought to be extended.
- No substantial works were carried out pursuant to the permission during the original period of the grant.
- The applicant failed to provide mandatory information required under Article 42(ff) of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001 (as amended) regarding the class of development and screening determination.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal sought an extension of duration for planning permission (Ref. 17/236) to install a second public entrance at Kelly's Pharmacy, Unit 5, Dungarvan Shopping Centre, Co. Waterford. Waterford City and County Council refused the application primarily because the development had not commenced and no substantial works were undertaken during the original permission period, as required by Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act. Additionally, the application was deemed non-compliant wi...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.