22784

removal of part of the main roof structure to the north-eastern end of an existing single storey residential dwelling, and the provision of a new first-floor element to that area, with a new pitched roof over. Also, conversion of the remaining part of the existing roof area to the south-western end to include the provision of a flat roof window to the front elevation and a dormer window to both the front and rear elevations. Works to include minor elevational changes to all 4 sides and associated site development works

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposal was refused due to its excessive scale and overbearing design relative to the existing dwelling and neighborhood character, combined with insufficient technical information regarding the capacity of the private wastewater treatment system.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed two-storey extension is considered excessive in scale, mass, and bulk, resulting in an overbearing impact on adjacent properties and failing to respect the character of the existing modest single-storey dwelling.
  • The development is inconsistent with the Meath County Development Plan 2021-2027, specifically Section 11.5.25 and Objective DM OBJ 50, which require residential extensions to harmonise with the existing dwelling and protect residential amenity.
  • The applicant failed to provide adequate information to demonstrate that the existing septic tank and percolation system have the capacity to cater for the increased demand arising from the expansion of the dwelling from three to six bedrooms.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Section 11.5.25DM OBJ 50Section 11.14.6A1 Existing Residential

Decision Document Summary

The applicant sought permission for a significant extension to an existing single-storey detached dwelling at 9 Tetrarch Grove, Clonee, involving the removal of part of the roof to facilitate a new first-floor element and attic conversion. The site is located within a small residential enclave zoned for 'Existing Residential' use. Meath County Council refused the application primarily because the scale and design of the proposed two-storey extension were deemed overbearing and out of character w...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.