22710

(a) construction of storey and half side and single storey extensions to the existing dwelling along with internal alterations and elevational changes, increasing the dwelling from a two bedroom to three bedroom house. (b) all associated site development works, drainage and landscaping to accommodate the extensions, (c) proposed waste water treatment system that meets current EPA standards and the provision of surface water soakway to meet BRE Digest 365 standards for the dwelling

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposal represents the consolidation of unauthorised development in a highly sensitive Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, failing to meet public health standards for wastewater treatment and creating a traffic hazard.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed development would consolidate unauthorised development on-site, as the existing dwelling and effluent treatment system do not have the benefit of planning permission.
  • The scale and elevated location of the extensions would create a discordant and obtrusive feature in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, seriously injuring the visual amenities and protected prospects of the Glencree Valley.
  • The proposal is prejudicial to public health due to insufficient site size for wastewater disposal and poses a significant traffic hazard due to inadequate sightlines at the junction with the L1011.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Wicklow County Development Plan 2016-2022Prospect 1Prospect 2Prospect 17Table 21 Map Ref. No. 5Policy for Waste Water Treatment and Disposal Systems for Single Houses (PE <=10)Appendix 1 Development Design Standards

Decision Document Summary

The applicant sought permission for the extension and renovation of an existing bungalow at 'Aurora', Enniskerry, located within the Glencree Valley Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The proposal was refused by Wicklow County Council primarily because it would consolidate previous unauthorised works on the site. Furthermore, the planning authority determined that the development would negatively impact protected scenic views, failed to meet the minimum 2,000sq.m site area required for safe on-...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.