Core Refusal Reason
The proposed two-storey rear extension is considered to have an overbearing impact and cause significant overshadowing on adjoining properties due to its excessive height, length, and proximity to site boundaries.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The scale and positioning of the first-floor rear extension would result in an overbearing impact and detrimental overshadowing of adjacent residential properties.
- The proposed front extension does not sufficiently reflect the architectural style and character of the existing dwelling, particularly concerning the roof design and entrance detailing.
- The submitted documentation lacks adequate detail to assess the impact on neighboring windows and the management of surface water runoff from the new structures.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Development Management DM 11Zoning: Existing Residential [RS]
Decision Document Summary
The application seeks permission for a first-floor rear extension and a ground-floor front extension at a mid-terrace dwelling at 103 St. Johns Park, Waterford City. The Planning Authority determined that the rear extension's scale and positioning would negatively impact the residential amenity of adjoining properties through overshadowing and an overbearing presence. Furthermore, the design of the front extension was found to be inconsistent with the existing house's character, and the applican...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.