22550

Permission for (1) the redevelopment and change of use of an existing four bedroom dwelling into a mixed residential unit development consisting of 2 no. one bedroom apartments and 2 no. two bedroom duplex units; (2) alterations to adjoining existing commercial unit to facilitate access to one of the duplex units; (3) elevational changes; (4) the construction of 2 no. new townhouse units to the rear of the existing dwelling incorporating private open space; (5) the development of a communal garden; (6) the provision of cycle parking; (7) the provision of bin storage and (8) all ancillary site development works including foul/surface drainage and water services. The development site is located in the confines of a Protected Structure - Ref. No. LH13706003

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The development was refused due to its detrimental impact on the setting of a Protected Structure and Architectural Conservation Area, substandard residential design standards, and the absence of a required archaeological assessment.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The design, scale, and material finishes of the proposed development are considered unsympathetic to the character of the Architectural Conservation Area and would negatively impact the setting and integrity of the on-site Protected Structure (Windmill).
  • The proposal constitutes a substandard residential development that fails to meet minimum requirements for internal room sizes, storage provision, and private open space, resulting in a poor level of amenity for future residents.
  • The applicant failed to provide a required Archaeological Impact Assessment for a site located within a Zone of Archaeological Potential, meaning the potential impact on archaeological heritage could not be properly evaluated.

Cited Policies (CDP)

CS 2SS 21SS 22SS 25SS 26HOU 18HOU 19HOU 20HOU 21HOU 22HOU 23HOU 24HOU 25HOU 26HOU 28HOU 30HOU 31HOU 32HOU 33NGB 6BHC 6BHC 7BHC 10BHC 20BHC 21BHC 22BHC 23BHC 31BHC 32IU 19IU 21NGB 38IU 26IU 27

Decision Document Summary

The proposal involved the redevelopment and change of use of an existing four-bedroom dwelling at Seatown Place, Dundalk, into a six-unit residential complex comprising apartments, duplexes, and townhouses. The site is highly sensitive, located within the Jocelyn/Seatown Architectural Conservation Area and containing a Protected Structure (a 19th-century windmill). Louth County Council refused permission because the design was deemed a 'mishmash' that failed to respect the heritage context, the ...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.