Core Refusal Reason
The application to extend the planning permission was refused because the development had not commenced and no substantial works had been carried out prior to the expiration of the original permission, as required by Section 42(1)(a)(i) of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The planning authority is not satisfied that the development to which permission P17/185 relates was commenced before the expiration of the appropriate period.
- No substantial works were carried out pursuant to the original permission during the appropriate period as verified by a site inspection.
- The application fails to meet the mandatory statutory requirements of Section 42(1)(a)(i) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended) for an extension of duration.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The applicants sought a five-year extension of the appropriate period for planning permission P17/185, which authorized the construction of a dwellinghouse, garage, and treatment system at Ballyduff, Barefield, Co. Clare. Following a site inspection, the planning authority determined that no works had commenced on-site and no substantial works had been undertaken during the life of the original permission. Consequently, the proposal failed to comply with the statutory requirements of Section 42 ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.