Core Refusal Reason
The extension of duration was refused because the development had not commenced and no substantial works were carried out during the appropriate period of the original planning permission, failing to meet the mandatory statutory requirements of Section 42(1)(a)(i) of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development to which the permission relates was not commenced before the expiration of the appropriate period sought to be extended.
- Substantial works were not carried out pursuant to the permission during the appropriate period, which is a necessary condition for an extension under Section 42(1)(a)(i) of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
- The applicant failed to provide the information required under Article 42(ff) of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001, meaning the application failed to comply with Section 42(1)(b) and (c) of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought an extension of duration for planning permission (Ref: 17/468) to convert attic space into habitable accommodation at an existing dwelling in Carrickadustra, Ballyduff Kilmeaden, Co. Waterford. The site is located in an area zoned for agriculture and designated as an 'Area Under Strong Urban Influence' in the Waterford City & County Development Plan 2022-2028. The Planning Authority refused the extension because the development had not commenced and no substantial works h...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.