22638

the construction of a cluster of five dwellings (4 no. detached dormer dwellings & 1 no. detached single storey dwelling) and five domestic garages, construction of new vehicular access and roadway off local road 7040-1, leading to five individual entrances to each of these five houses, as well as the formation of five gravel driveways serving these properties, installation of five Streamline wastewater treatment systems and five polishing filters, construction of ten soakaways (two per residential site) and all associated site works and services including a connection to the public mains water supply system and site landscaping

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposal represents an excessive density of rural housing in an area under significant development pressure, leading to suburbanisation and piecemeal development near the Newbridge town boundary, coupled with insufficient technical information regarding wastewater and access.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The development would exacerbate an excessive density of housing in a rural area lacking public services, leading to suburbanisation and contravening Policy RH9 of the Kildare County Development Plan 2017-2023.
  • Due to its proximity to Newbridge, the proposal constitutes piecemeal and haphazard development that undermines the orderly development of the town where ample zoned land is already available.
  • The application failed to demonstrate that the site is suitable for five on-site wastewater treatment systems or that safe vehicular access with adequate sight distances could be provided.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Policy RH2Policy RH9Policy RH10Policy RH11Policy RH13Chapter 4Chapter 13Chapter 14Chapter 16Chapter 17Table 4.3Map 4.4

Decision Document Summary

The application proposed a family cluster of five dwellings and domestic garages on a 3.9952ha site at Roseberry, Newbridge, Co. Kildare. The site is situated in a rural area approximately 880m from the Newbridge development boundary. The planning authority refused the proposal on the grounds that it would lead to an excessive density of development and suburbanisation in a rural area already under pressure. Additionally, the development was considered to conflict with policies preventing haphaz...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.