Core Refusal Reason
The proposed dwelling is inappropriately sited in an exposed, elevated location on Clare Island, which would be visually obtrusive and adversely impact the character of the landscape, contravening Objective RHO 4 of the County Development Plan.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed development is located in an inappropriately exposed and elevated position on Clare Island, making it visually prominent and obtrusive within the landscape.
- The proposal fails to meet the criteria of Objective RHO 4 as it impinges on the character, integrity, and distinctiveness of the area and cannot be considered at an alternative, less sensitive location.
- The planning authority determined that more suitable, less conspicuous locations exist within the applicant's family landholding that would better preserve the character of the landscape.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective RHO 4Mayo County Development Plan 2022-2028
Decision Document Summary
This application sought permission for a 155.5 sqm single-storey dwelling house on a 0.39-hectare site at Fawnglass, Clare Island, Co. Mayo. Despite revisions from a previous withdrawn application (Ref: 22/101), Mayo County Council refused permission because the proposed site is situated in a highly exposed and elevated position. The planning authority concluded that the development would be visually obtrusive, interfering with the preserved character of the landscape and contravening Objective ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.