22847

Permission and Retention Permission for development consisting of 1. The retention of the change of use of the rear structure from a garage to an independent dwelling unit. 2. Demolition of the porch attached to the independent dwelling unit. 3. A single storey extension to the independent dwelling unit. 4. Demolition of the bay window and kitchen extension at ground floor level and demolition of the 2no. bay windows and the balcony at first floor level to the rear of the detached four bedroom main dwelling. 5. A single storey extension along the rear of the main dwelling at ground floor level, which includes 2no. roof lights and forms a new balcony at first floor level. Also included are new windows to replace the first floor bay window.

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposal failed to justify the need for an independent living unit, exceeded floor area guidelines for such units, and lacked sufficient technical details regarding wastewater and surface water management.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The applicant failed to demonstrate a genuine need for the independent living unit, which at 91sqm significantly exceeds the 50sqm guideline and constitutes an unauthorized self-contained dwelling rather than ancillary accommodation.
  • The presence of unauthorized structures on the site, specifically a metal shed and greenhouse, precludes the Planning Authority from granting permission for the development in this instance.
  • Insufficient information was provided to confirm that the existing wastewater treatment system and surface water disposal arrangements are capable of handling the additional load, posing a potential risk to public health and the environment.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Chapter 13.9.21Section 13.8.36Policy IU 16Policy IU 17Policy IU 18Policy IU 19HOU 34MOV 56MOV 57ENV 39IU 26IU 27Section 13.9.20

Decision Document Summary

The application sought permission and retention for the conversion of a garage into an independent dwelling unit and various extensions to the main house at Homelee, Dromiskin, Co. Louth. While the physical extensions to the main dwelling were generally considered acceptable in design, the overall proposal was refused. The primary grounds for refusal included the failure to justify the need for a family flat, the excessive scale of the converted unit which functioned as a separate dwelling, the ...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.