5474/22

The development will consist of: (i) A new attic level conversion and dormer roof extension to include alterations to rear elevation of existing dwelling , together with minor internal alterations, associated landscaping, boundary treatment, site and engineering works necessary to facilitate the development.

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

The Inspector recommended the removal of Condition 3, concluding that the proposed 4.55m wide dormer is visually subordinate within the continuous terrace roof plane, satisfies the design criteria of the Development Plan, and does not adversely impact residential or visual amenity.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed dormer at 4.55m width is visually subordinate within the rear roof plane of the terrace, as a large expanse of the original roof remains visible with no distinction between the subject site and the adjoining continuous roof surfaces.
  • The development would represent a reasonable improvement of the accommodation on site and will not give rise to overlooking of adjoining properties due to the absence of directly opposing windows.
  • The contemporary design solution and materials relate successfully to the existing windows and satisfy the requirements of Appendix 18 of the Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Zoning Objective Z1 (to protect, provide and improve residential amenities)Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028 Appendix 18, Section 1Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028 Appendix 18, Section 1.1 (General Design Principles)Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028 Appendix 18, Section 5 (Attic Conversions / Dormer Windows)

Decision Document Summary

The application relates to a proposed attic conversion and a 4.55m wide rear dormer roof extension at a mid-terrace dwelling in Clontarf. Dublin City Council granted permission but imposed a condition (No. 3) requiring the dormer width be reduced to 2.85m to ensure subordination to the roof. The applicant appealed this condition, arguing it was too onerous and hampered the functionality of the new office space. The Inspector noted that the house is part of a terrace of eight sharing a continuous...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP