Core Refusal Reason
The development had not commenced and no substantial works were carried out prior to the application for extension of duration, failing to meet the statutory requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- A site inspection conducted on 06.01.2023 confirmed that development on the site had not yet commenced.
- The application fails to satisfy the mandatory requirements of Section 42(1)(a)(i)(I) and (II) of the Planning and Development Act 2000, as amended, regarding the commencement of works.
- As no substantial works were undertaken during the original permission period, the planning authority is precluded from granting an extension of duration.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought an extension of duration for planning permission (Ref: 17/601189) for a single-storey rear extension and a domestic garage at Bohercrowe, Limerick Road, Tipperary Town. Following a site inspection, the planning authority determined that development had not commenced and no substantial works had been carried out within the original five-year permission period. Consequently, the application was refused as it failed to meet the statutory criteria set out in Section 42 of the...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.