Core Refusal Reason
Failure to demonstrate that substantial works were carried out under the original permission and failure to provide mandatory information for EIA screening.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The planning authority was not satisfied that substantial works were carried out pursuant to the original permission (17/780) within the appropriate period as required by the Planning and Development Act.
- The applicant failed to provide the necessary information required under Article 42(ff) of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001 to enable an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) screening determination.
- The application fails to comply with the statutory requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended) regarding the extension of duration of a planning permission.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
Nevin Construction sought an extension of duration for planning permission 17/780, which involved the demolition of a bungalow and the construction of 8 houses at Bilberry, Waterford. The site is located on lands zoned for 'Existing Residential' and 'Open Space and Recreation' under the Waterford City & County Development Plan 2022-2028. The local authority refused the extension because it was not demonstrated that substantial works had been undertaken on the specific project within the original...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.