Core Planning Reasoning
The proposal is for permission consequent on a grant of outline permission; as the application conforms with the conditions of the outline grant and residentially zoned land, permission is granted under Section 36(4) of the Planning Act.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The principle of development is established by both the previous grant of outline permission (ABP-305694-19) and the site's 'Objective A' residential zoning.
- While traffic sightlines at the entrance are restricted, they were previously deemed acceptable at the outline stage, and the proposed 6.15m setback effectively mitigates ingress-related hazards.
- The proposed dwelling will not result in significant overlooking or overshadowing of adjacent properties, though a condition is required to reduce the height of the front pitched roof section for better visual integration.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective ASection 36(4) of the Planning ActChapter 2 - Core StrategySection 2.6.2.1Policy Objective CS12Chapter 4 - Neighbourhood, People, Homes and PlacesPolicy Objective PHP20Chapter 12 Development ManagementSection 12.3.7.5Section 12.3.7.7Policy Objective PHP19
Decision Document Summary
The applicant is seeking permission consequent to a grant of outline permission for a detached, single-storey four-bedroom house (188sqm) on an infill site at Killiney Hill Road. The site is currently undeveloped, landlocked by existing housing, and lacks vehicular access. Key concerns raised by third-party appellants included traffic safety hazards due to poor sightlines and potential overshadowing. The Inspector notes that under Section 36(4) of the Planning and Development Act, the planning a...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP