23127

for (1) to RETAIN part of land reclamation works consisting of peat topsoil extraction, hardcore gravel, access track and fencing. (2) PERMISSION for removal of part of land reclamation works consisting of hardcore gravel, fencing and container and reinstatement of stockpiled peat topsoil and (3)PERMISSION for the installation of a 30m multi-user lattice support structure carrying telecommunications equipment including antennas, dishes, together with concrete equipment building, cabinets and all associated site development works. The proposed development is in a different location to that proposed under planning reference P22/453 which was refused permission. The development will provide for strategic transmission of wireless data and broadband services

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposal was refused due to the resulting net loss of habitat within a Natural Heritage Area (NHA) and the failure to adequately demonstrate that co-location on existing telecommunications infrastructure was not a viable alternative.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed development would result in a net loss of habitat within a Natural Heritage Area (NHA).
  • The applicant failed to sufficiently discount the possibility of co-locating the telecommunications equipment on existing structures despite demonstrating a coverage requirement.
  • The development, which includes the retention of unauthorized land reclamation works and a new 30m lattice tower, is located in a sensitive area where a previous similar application (P22/453) was also refused.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Decision Document Summary

Hibernian Cellular Networks Limited sought permission for the retention of land reclamation works and the installation of a 30m multi-user lattice telecommunications structure at Reaskcamoge, Woodcock Hill, Co. Clare. The project aimed to provide strategic wireless data and broadband services. Clare County Council refused the application because the works would lead to a net loss of habitat within a Natural Heritage Area and because the applicant did not adequately prove that co-location with ex...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.