Core Refusal Reason
The proposed extension's design and layout create the appearance of a separate dwelling rather than an integrated extension, negatively impacting the original building's character and failing to meet standards for ancillary units.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The design, featuring separate entrances and distinct fenestration, creates the impression of two independent dwellings rather than a single integrated unit.
- The extension's proximity to the front building line results in an over-dominating visual impact that detracts from the character of the original traditional-style dwelling.
- The proposal lacks sufficient detail to be assessed as an ancillary family unit under Section 3.3 of the Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 3.3 Self-contained Residential Unit for a Family Member
Decision Document Summary
This application sought permission for a two-storey extension and alterations to an existing two-storey dwelling at Raheenduff, Adamstown. The local authority refused the proposal primarily because the design, which included separate entrances and a distinct architectural style, made the extension appear as a separate dwelling rather than an integrated addition. Furthermore, its prominent position near the front building line was deemed visually intrusive, and the application failed to provide a...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.