Core Refusal Reason
The proposal was refused due to inadequate parking and traffic safety concerns, the over-concentration of takeaway uses in Edgeworthstown, and insufficient information regarding the protection of residential amenity for occupants above the unit.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The applicant failed to demonstrate adequate access and parking arrangements, meaning the development would likely endanger public safety by creating a traffic hazard and obstructing road users.
- The proposed development would result in an over-concentration and over-intensification of takeaway outlets in the area, contrary to the cumulative effect policies set out in the County Development Plan.
- Due to a lack of submitted information regarding noise, odour, and litter management, the Planning Authority could not determine if the proposal would negatively impact the residential amenity of the apartments located directly above the unit.
Cited Policies (CDP)
DMS 16.147DMS 16.148DMS 16.150Chapter 16 Development Management StandardsSub-Section 16.4.13
Decision Document Summary
This application proposed the change of use of an existing 70sqm ground floor retail unit to a restaurant/take-away outlet at Unit 4 Auburn Court, Pound Street, Edgeworthstown. The site is located within a settlement envelope and host building that includes residential apartments on the upper floors. Longford County Council refused the application because the applicant did not provide evidence of adequate parking to serve the use, which could lead to traffic hazards. Additionally, the council ci...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.